ZAIR ALI versus CHIEF ENGINEER (FATA) WORKS AND SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PESHAWAR
Article 247 (7) Civil Procedure Code (V8 of 1908), O VII, R10 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 454 The suit for the return of the plaintiff was given a road width and construction contract which In the tribal area, the plaintiff had completed satisfactory work according to the required details and payment was made to the plaintiff in this regard. Some notable persons and tribal elders in the area demanded 15% national commission from the plaintiff. , Which stated that the respondent opposed the case and filed a trial petition with the trial court under OVII, R 10, CPC that the tribal Ali Interesting civil court on the issue of vomiting and lack of jurisdiction to decide. Taken together, the Civil Court had absolutely no jurisdiction in this matter, even in the case of Article 247 (the High Court had jurisdiction over the bar under section 7). I was stripped of the Constitution, all matters were outside the jurisdiction and jurisdiction of the court, and they fell under the jurisdiction of the political authorities, where there was a proper rating for participation in such a dispute. The following courts properly entertained the plaintiffs' request for the return of the plaintiff under invalid order, R-10, CPC, in which no interference was guaranteed and so on. According to which it was retained.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
