Article 42, Su 54 and decla 55 In the case for declaratory, permanent and mandatory injunction, the part of his uncle's estate was attended by his real brother, while under Shariah the deceased holds close to the Muslim. Rare has been excluded from doing so. Take part in the inheritance, in the presence of the real brother, the transfer property under the customary custody of the deceased nephew and the deceased nephew's sons was rightly challenged by the plaintiffs but the courts must rectify the legally valid record. The decree was issued to justify it. It opened in the year when the controversial legacy was confirmed under the customary change of 59, 1930, but the original owner's entire inheritance remained in the possession of his brother and in the subsequent jamabandi only the defendants were listed as Gharkhelkar. was done. And the descendants of the deceased brother learned of the revenue entries only when the production suit was brought against them and, after that, they were able to challenge the conversion of Islam into a profitable inheritance without loss. The lawsuit was filed, guaranteeing the interference of the High Court in unlawful amendment jurisdiction to investigate material misconduct, misrepresentation or misreading of the two courts, or finding of any jurisdiction, review. The request for was removed, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
