A conditional order for eliminating the distress of sections 133 and 561 is to enforce the rights of the individual and the jurisdiction, or to resolve private disputes by resorting to the provisions of section 133, the CCP scope complainant (defendants) (Petitioner) had filed a complaint with the complainant that they were using an old way to get closer to their home, but after the new road was built, the accused forced the road near his fields to be used for land. The blockade was made by a section, and that the newly constructed road did not work much. But the court rejected the complaint verse was revealed to the disclosure of evidence in the Magistrate's approval of the parties that the new road was wider than the old way and was in existence. In the last nearly six years, the new road was easily accessible to all residents of the area, and even complainants acknowledged that the new road was closer to their homes than the old road but they feared it Their houses were at some height from the new road, which made it difficult to reach them. The most important aspect of the matter was whether the old road was a public or a private route, which was not established on the record, but the present complaint was made only by one of the complainants in the individual capacity of other inhabitants of the area or of the land. Was registered without owners, which pointed to the fact that it was not a public road but was built. In the present case, the purpose of the complainants is to make Section 133, c.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
