ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR, EVACUEE TRUST PROPERTY, D.I. KHAN AND BANNU DIVISIONS versus SADAULLAH KHAN
Articles 8 and 14 of the Special Relief Act (in 1877), sections 554 and 55 of the Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), O VII, R 10 suit filed for permanent, compulsory and prohibited reversal of a permanent, mandatory and prohibited injunction An order against the prosecuting authorities to stop the shop from going; and for not taking any constructions on it, the plaintiff claimed ownership of his shop on the basis of Vizica with his specific limitations, but In the trial before the trial court, he came up with different limitations, and he sought a permanent injunction. In order to bring it under the jurisdiction of the Civil Court, the evacuation trust was the property of the evacuated trust, both in terms of the eviction trust property and sought to repair the main entrance to the aforesaid section with the permission of the authorities. The property civil court lacks jurisdiction in cases where the appellate court has granted jurisdiction over the above court in view of the bar contained in section 14 of the Evacuee Trust Properties (Management and Disposal) Act, 1975. Rejected on and made a mistake in disregarding the legal provisions. The above-mentioned appellate court had set aside the unwanted decisions and injunctions of the said Act and the civil court upheld
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
