An attempt to commit Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Rule 324/34, and the request for the termination of the joint intention bail, was alleged against the accused (defendant), who had accused his brothers (co. Accused) together with the accused. The complainant's argument on the complaint of the complainant (applicant) due to a previous blood disorder between the parties was that he was directly charged for the fireworks injury. The complainant's medical legal report fully supported the accusation against the complainant, and it was the strict intention of the accused to commit the act, which alone resulted in the legally injuring the complainant. So he accused three real brothers (accused and co-accused). And it could not be ascertained who injured the complainant in the firefight and the complainant's medical medical report was not in accordance with the complainant's general account of the delay in filing the report. The possibility of false allegations against the accused was not ruled out. Can be done Due to a previous blood dispute between the parties, in the event of circumstance, the request for cancellation of bail was dismissed.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
