An attempt to repeal Section 497 (5) of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), section 302/324/34 murder AMD, murder AMD, the request for the cancellation of the joint intention guarantee revealed that the incident was within 35/35 distance. At kilometers away from the police station, the report was filed at the hospital, which was about 60 kilometers from the location of the incident. The FIR further revealed that the deceased was brought to the hospital in critical condition, and in the circumstances, his delivery of medical aid, deceased relatives and survivors was the highest priority for the victim, rather than filing a report. The case for delay in filing could not have been against the complainant at the bail-out stage, which otherwise had no basis for its approval. The bail accused and his accomplices were directly charged in the FIR in which the shotgun-infested firing occurred, and the victim's medical report revealed several stab wounds to various parts of the victim. Were. The physical body, which could not have been a result of a single fire due to the proportion of bullets spread, as reported by the Medical Jurisprudence Medical Complaint, has been fully supported by the complainant's version and has been found to contain blood from the location of the deceased. Has been recovered. The shotgun blank was also recovered from the location of the co-accused, which was also equipped with a repeater shotgun. The suspect was fired with a double-barrel shotgun, which does not automatically remove the vacant, so the recovery of other vacancies was heard. I could not answer. The accused was associated with the crime, which could have led to his death sentence, and no further investigation was left, the accused's alibi
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
