Section 5 property5 Appeals against the abduction or abduction of property, valuation, security, etc. The FIR was filed almost one year after the incident of abduction and ransom payment, with no prosecution without giving any plausible explanation. The witness also did not admit that the accused had paid the ransom on the inquiry officer's demand, which according to his investigation, the FIR story was neither missed nor the whereabouts of the two victims were identified. Nor is it on record that the house was guarded by the raid at the raid and he appealed to the common man to argue. Did not That the accused could risk disclosing the details of the place where the kidnappers detained prosecution witnesses through them and gave them ample time to contact them outside to obtain ransom money and They returned to the same place for payment, the prosecution's witnesses did not tell the truth of the case, so their fact and integrity did not go beyond the board, recovery did not proceed to the prosecution case and if the defendant against the accused proved Then it would not be enough to connect them with the kidnapping charges because of the restoration. That are used for authentication. The main allegation, which failed to prove the prosecution and what to say about the other, unless it can be shown that the lower court's decision was misleading or completely invalid and did not yield any other result. Except that the accused was falsely evidenced as a result of the crime or the spread of wrong vehicles of justice;
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
