Join Sections 302 (b), 324, 337f (II), 337f (ii), 109 and 34; The testimony of the cross-version court was required to analyze the court's duty, in the case of cross-version, the first prosecution case to ascertain its truth or else in the present case, the matter was reported to the police by a delay of four hours. Was made and in thirty minutes neither the doctor of the hospital where the deceased was taken, he appeared in the trial court nor any document in this regard. Brought to the record, the story of the victim being transported to the hospital is being prosecuted by another witness who stated that witnesses were present at the site of the prosecution's story and incident at the post-mortem examination, which died on the eve of death. But, the prosecution's witnesses were witnesses of the occasion because they were not from the village where the incident occurred. Witnesses said they went to the scene to attend the birthday party of the daughter of one of the RA RA's granddaughters but could not show any relationship with them, said RA \ Syed \ RA of the trial court's prosecution story. The witness whose testimony went to attend the scene of the incident did not prove at the trial that the minor minor injured was taken to the hospital, followed by the prosecution. It was alleged that the victim refused to hand over his daughter to the complainant party but the complainant did not reveal the boy's name. There is Kriska for whom the victim's daughter's hand was sought
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
