Find a Lawyer

DR. AJMAL SHAH versus GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA THROUGH SECRETARY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, HEALTH SECRETARIATE, PESHAWAR

Article 199 Constitution Petition Civil Service Ad hoc Contract Appointment Applicants Appointment of Defendants Based on Ad hoc Contracting as Plaintiff Professor Surgery alleges that Appointment by Authorities Without the Discretion and Legal Option They are more qualified for the appointment appointed with the Public Service Commission The final authority of the plaintiffs represented the ad hocism of the authorities and directed that the High Court, without proper request to the Public Service Commission. The entire selection process should not be completed after six months. The High Court further directed that the contractor appointment of the respondent be renewed and that the post be filled up by the Public Service Commission's Select and other experienced and qualified candidates may apply in such election. According to that

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012

• TAJ MUHAMMAD KHAN v. COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION, GHAZI BAROTHA HYDRO POWER PROJECT, GHAZI 2012 CLC 1316
• Mrs. SHAGUFTA SHAHEEN v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1317
• R&S PHARMACY ESTABLISHMENT, through Rizwan Hameed v. MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT, DHQ HOSPITAL, HARIPUR 2012 MLD 1323
• HABIB KHAN v. DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN 2012 YLR 1325
• Dr. ASHFAQ AHMAD KHAN v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PESHAWAR 2012 PTD 1329
• MUSLIM KHAN v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1331
• NIJAT ALI v. SHARIF KHAN 2012 CLC 1333
• MUHAMMAD SAEED KHAN v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1337

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2012 →

list of supreme court advocates from Gakhar Mandi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes