Sections 2 302 and at 452 Definition of home wrongdoing and evidence after preparing for murder, injury, assault, wrongful restriction The nightly incident was reported to the accused in a substantial, unusual and unknown delay. He was later nominated on the basis of Wajitkar. The evidence is the only complainant, who was also an eyewitness, did not identify the accused. He designated the accused based on information provided to him by the witness. The complainant claimed that he was the accused's first cousin and mentioned his properties but did not identify his death. But no blackness was found around the injury. The FIR was lodged with a delay of six hours but the accused was not named yet. Was not presented by. Negative indications can be drawn that such a witness did not support the prosecution witness's failure to prove Wajitkar's prosecution was not charged with any motive in the FIR by the complainant later on the testimony of other prosecution witnesses. Was not endorsed by others where the recovery of other privileges was of no importance. Pieces of Evidence Denied Pieces Recovery Was Not Presented Before Trial The Court Prosecutor Failed to Perform Its Responsibility to Prove the Charge beyond the Shadow of Doubt, Not Many Doubts No doubt in the wise mind was enough to acquit the accused
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
