Complainant, after preparation for complicity in injunction, assault or wrongful restraint, abetment, murder and deliberations, minor motives, following the injunctions of Sections 200, Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 452, 109, 302, 324 and 34 of the House. The plaintiff applicant / complainant's party filed a private complaint against the accused in the murder of the son of the angel complainant; during the investigation, the cross-version submitted by the accused party failed to succeed. Which was rejected by the trial court, was primarily that the respondents had a malicious device to frustrate the murder case proceedings, The step-by-step order was set aside by the High Court in review jurisdiction, and a case trial was remanded. The trial court summoned the applicants on the remand of the case, before the trial court, which was taken by the trial court, under which the respondent's petition was remanded to re-hear the defendant's arguments in the complainant's case. Private complaints filed by him were dismissed, were not perverse or illegal and illegal; upon approval of the review petition filed by the defendant, no material alterations were made on the record, or any other evidence was presented. Was. The delay in the respondent's filing of a private complaint to strengthen the case of the complainant was an important factor in taking notice of the doubts of his own personal grievance, which was allowed to request review and was not heard. The order by which the trial court sought the petitioner was, in the circumstances, set aside
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
