ABDUL MAJEED versus THE ACCOUNTABILITY JUDGE-I, QUETTA
Section A 31 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Article 87 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 9 and 10 A warrant for arrest of accused and co-accused has been issued for the purpose of avoiding service of appreciation of evidence in order to avoid deportation and in this case Was sent to the police and the investigating officer but could not be executed under Section Pr87, CRPC was issued and the notice was placed on the notice board of the court. Was registered and the accused was prosecuted under Section 31A of the National Accountability Ordinance 1999, he was present in another city and unaware of this action Nothing was available on record which could prove that At his address, the trial court issued a notice against the accused. The prosecution in the appeal failed to prove that the defendant intentionally or knowingly sued himself was in breach of the provisions of Articles 9 and 10 of the Constitution, therefore, under trial. The punishment given by the source could not be sustained. The accused was convicted and sentenced under Section 31A of the National Accountability Ordinance. 1999, and get the case remanded in a trial court for a fresh trial.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
