Find a Lawyer

ARSHAD MASIH versus THE STATE

Sections 302 (b), 315 and 316 murders, killings and the testimony of the testimony The church party alleged that the victim was stoned to death in the heat of the summer, prosecution witnesses testified. Was attacked or killed in the presence of a large gathering / party. The trial court's finding of the accused was not challenged by the accused or the prosecution alleges that he was required to be sentenced under Section 16, PPC conviction and section 230 (B), the conviction of the accused under PPC was set aside and it was punished and sentenced under section 316, accordingly the PPC appeal was dealt with.

Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012

• MUHAMMAD AFZAL alias MAZEL v. Haji HAQ DAD 2012 MLD 1627
• INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, BALOCHISTAN, QUETTA v. GHULAM RASOOL 2012 CLC 1645
• ABDUL MAJEED v. THE ACCOUNTABILITY JUDGE-I, QUETTA 2012 PCrLJ 1647
• COMMISSIONER MEKRAN v. Haji ABDUL WAHID 2012 CLD 1659
• SHEY MUREED v. THE STATE 2012 PCrLJ 1691
• BIBI AMINA v. MUHAMMAD IQBAL 2012 CLC 1699
• ABDUL KHALIQ v. THE STATE 2012 PCrLJ 1717
• NAIMATULLAH v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1729

All Quetta High Court Balochistan judgments of 2012 →

how to become a advocate from Shadiwal lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes