The suspect was the driver of the undercover vehicle and was stopped in a check, appreciating the evidence of Section 9 (c) drug possession. Post and after the search, 150kg of marijuana was charged with recovering from a secret cave, the trial court convicted the accused under section 9 (c) of the Narcotic Substances Act 1997, but the co-accused was acquitted. Cordia, who was a passenger in the suspect's car, said that the accused was released from the charge on the same set of evidence. According to the prosecution's testimony after separating samples for chemical analysis, the amount of hashish was still 150kg, according to an FIR, and the samples were processed for analysis after a delay of five days. Were sent. The co-accused, who requested to be lifted from the accused's vehicle, was acquitted by the trial court on the basis that his case was as separate as the accused's, as there was no direct or indirect evidence. To link him to the commission of the crime; since his knowledge of concealing drugs could not be brought on the record. Since he was a person over 65 years of age and had no relationship or tribal relationship with the accused, and as was a letter on the record which revealed that the relative of the co-accused had gone missing Complaint was made when he was traveling home and said that the trial court's findings in connection with the fate of the accused were understandable and justified. All the prosecution witnesses were examined at length, but the defense failed to create any grief or suspicion in the prosecution's case. The chemical analyst proved that the recovered intoxicant was foursome, defense said
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2012
