MASOOD AHMED BHATTI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, M/O. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATION
Section 35 (1) (2) Proviso & 36 (1) Employees' Terms and Conditions of Service were employed by the Federal Government in the Appellant Telephone and Telegraph Department, which was changed to Pakistan Telecommunication Corporation and eventually Pakistan Telecommunications Becomes Company Limited (PTCL) Appellant's Complaint, was that the High Court refused to enforce the judgment passed by the service tribunal in favor of it, on the basis that it was a Pakistan Telecommunication Company. Ltd. was an employee and its service was not legally operated, which was taken over by the employees. The Company was that the Federal Government had guaranteed the existing terms and conditions of service, which included the pension benefits of the employees who were transferred from the Corporation to the Company at the time of the transfer when the Appellant Corporation ceased to be an employee. The company, which was admittedly operating under the rules and regulations, was protected by the Pakistan Telecommunication (Reorganization) Act, 1996, therefore, it has been stated that according to the rules and regulations There were legal rules that a corporation could create beneficial rules in relation to its employees, which in addition to the 1 Was a plus. Based on the provision of section 35 (2) of the Pakistan Telecommunication (Reorganization) Act, 1996, the Company did not have the power to infringe upon the terms and conditions of service of its employees who were formerly employees of the Corporation. Even the federal government, under section 35 of the Pakistan Telecommunication (Reorganization) Act, 1996, was less likely to harm the appellant guarantee by varying the terms and conditions of service.
