Find a Lawyer

FAREED AHMED JANJUA versus PUNJAB SMALL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION

Article 199 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 151 Constitutional Submissions Deleted for Illegal Procedure by High Court Reinstatement Constitutional High Court dismissed for illegal proceedings because the applicant's lawyer suffered from his illness. Were usually absent because of the disclosure of the inclination to equip before the full hearing of the appellant's constitutional petition shows that he has a good case for appeal in the appeal for rehabilitation. Aspects of the reality of the fundamentals raised by the contributor Was not contested. In the absence of a counter affidavit, a lawyer's affidavit regarding his illness was to be taken at his cost and at no stage did the High Court accept, the basis of his illness through a medical certificate from a lawyer. Advice for supporting is not required. His absence due to intolerance had to be accepted by the Supreme Court approved by the Order High Court and the petition filed by the appellant was restored.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2012

• MUSHTAQ v. State 2012 SCMR 109
• SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, REVENUE DEPARTMENT v. SAJJAD AHMAD 2012 SCMR 114
• DOST MUHAMMAD v. State 2012 SCMR 117
• MEHMOOD HASSAN HARVI v. THE STATE 2012 SCMR 119
• SECRETARY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION v. Rana ARSHAD KHAN 2012 SCMR 126
• RAHIM BAKHSH v. GHULAM NABI 2012 SCMR 130
• MUHAMMAD YASIN v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad 2012 PLD 132
• E.D.O. (EDU.) BAHAWALNAGAR v. MUHAMMAD AKRAM 2012 SCMR 133

All Supreme Court judgments of 2012 →

criminal advocate from Issa Khel lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes