Article 39 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1980, OXXX, R6 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3) The deletion of the document to affect the compromise between the parties, after the appeal before the Supreme Court was dismissed for non-prosecution. had gone. , The parties filed a petition under the Supreme Court Rules 1980 under OLXS, R6, to settle the appeal in the settlement case, the Chief Justice disposed of the petition, directing the parties to present the agreement before the court, The decree, which was dismissed by the High Court in light of the directions passed by the Supreme Court, which has already been decided and can be sought by the petitioner, was assigned to record the plea raised by the petitioner. No compromise was entered into, nor can a compromise be imposed on a pre-determined appeal. The petitioner's legitimate claim was rejected by the order of the Supreme Court approved in the application under O XXX, R 6 o The application to the Supreme Court Rules, 1980, as a compromise, which was in writing. Was brought on record with. At the time of the decision of the petition, a lawyer was identified by the applicant, who had never objected to the execution or objection to the object or the validity / agreement of the contract and this was clearly mentioned before the Supreme Court. It was reported that the parties had reached an agreement and if that was approved, the litigation between the parties would be terminated. In a strange situation, the parties were advised to refer to the court whose order / amendment Wanted to amend He was well aware of the agreement / agreement leaked
