RIAZ AHMAD versus PAKISTAN RAILWAY THROUGH DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT RAILWAYS
Article 199 Constitution Petition Lease, Enlarged in Contract Liability Developed by the Discretionary Relief Policy Department, the scope petitioner was directed to cancel the leasehold land after the lease expired. Hand it over The lease and the unpublished letter was entitled to another term. The litigation should have shown that there was a clear and non-contentious right or interest in his favor that was recognized and respected for the enforcement of the obligations required by Mandamus Relief. The applicant can only be awarded in a contract specific performance case that was not open to scrutiny of contractual obligations or disputes under constitutional jurisdiction that could be resolved by other measures available under the law. The department had formulated a policy that the land should not be leased out. In case of land leased for a period not exceeding 03 years, no extension shall be extended beyond 10 years. The implied letter was issued in pursuance of a policy devised by the competent authority and was implemented across the country. The fact is that there is only one truth and one case. The policy formulated by the authorized authority could not be revoked, which in the absence of which had to be specified and vague, the respondents were bid higher for the lease of land against the amount paid by the applicant. Unlawful gains even when the High Court has taken unlawful action in the presence of an unlawful, unlawful or unlawful act in a financial matter, may be construed by the competent authority
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
