STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN versus MST. MANZOOR BIBI
Liquidated damages payment for the late settlement of Articles 118 and 124 Claims Appellant Insurance Corporation rejected the order of the insurance tribunal under which the claimant's application was allowed under Section 118 of the Insurance Ordinance 2000 and he was allowed to receive the insurance claim. Were found to be entitled to damages, including damages. Appellant Insurance Corp. stated that the deceased died due to an accident involving handling of firearms, of which the insurer did business and such business was not disclosed to the insurance corporation at the time of purchase of the policy. Was made, so no claim could be made. At the time of the issuance of the insurance policy; the appellant insurance corporation investigated by its own medical expert and other sources, but nothing was brought on the record which prevented the insurance corporation from issuing the insurance policy when the appellant's insurance. If the corporation rejected the insurance policy, the above letter did not contain any reasonable justification for denying the claim, except that the insurance insurer did not disclose some material facts at the time of purchasing the policy pursuant to section 118 of the 2000 Ordinance. In the ninth day, the test of the claimant's case was not finalized, nor was any payment made and the policy was rejected by the Appellant Insurance Corporation after the expiry of that period. The claimant, therefore, was held to receive precise damages as well as the appellant's insurance corporation failed to prove its case in the absence of any witnesses. And so his request was not found to be valid
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
