Section 7 (a) Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 395 and 109 of the Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Sections 164 and 342 were charged with robbery with murder and aggravated burglary of a dossier. Was. During the robbery the convict was convicted of double murder and sentenced to death, while all the other accused were generally acquitted under section 342, CR, on admission or denied by a criminal, no matter the CCPC's. Was not and has proved the prosecution beyond reasonable doubt. The victim was tortured by the police, while under Section 2 Cr?, a contradictory plea against the CCP pleaded that he was never presented to a magistrate, indicating that The case against the accused was proved by the prosecution, the suspect was identified by the complainant and the recovery of the looted money and pistol was affected. The vehicle used in the crime was also recovered at the identification of the accused, which was obtained by the prosecution witnesses. Assigned a special role. Earlier, the magistrate confessed to linking the accused to the commission of the alleged crime, independent witnesses to the prosecution of the dispute, who at the time of the incident identified the accused by the persons involved, accused both of the witnesses. There was no enmity or introduction to the character of It was fully clarified by the two prosecution witnesses, who were inside the shop and were not examined, evidence of the testimony of the two other prosecution witnesses that the prosecutor reasonably suspected Was able to prove the case against the trial court and the High Court
