Find a Lawyer

FAIZ-UR-REHMAN versus STATE

Section 5 evidence5 Abduction for ransom Abduction for kidnapping The evidence of ransom was found after the accused's identification was delayed. The accused did not recover from the arrest of the alleged kidnapper, who came to himself and appeared before the police on his own. The complainant or the alleged kidnapper or someone else ransacked the accused or another person Did not pay the alleged kidnapper. The accused was not abducted in the absence of any further evidence on the record of the accused's involvement in the alleged crime, the prosecutor failed to prove his case against reasonable doubt; the Supreme Court admitted delay in filing the appeal. And convicted and the court below convicted and acquitted the accused.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2012

• Syed YOUSAF RAZA GILLANI v. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN 2012 SCMR 519
• Dr. AKHTAR HASSAN KHAN v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2012 CLD 520
• MUHAMMAD FAYYAZ v. State 2012 SCMR 522
• FAIZULLAH v. State 2012 SCMR 524
• Col. (Retd.) MANSOOR AKBAR v. FAZAL-E-RAB PIRZADA 2012 SCMR 540
• COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS v. MAPLE LEAF CEMENT FACTORY LTD. 2012 PTD 541
• MUHAMMAD SARFRAZ v. State 2012 SCMR 549
• MUHAMMAD JAMEEL RAHI v. D.-G. NAB 2012 SCMR 552

All Supreme Court judgments of 2012 →

us immigration advocates from Tando Jam lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes