FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY DEFENCE versus ABDUL BASIT
Section 20 (1) Rules of Pak Air Force, 1957, R31 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 (3) Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court Oster Clause under Article 199 (3) of the Constitution, Removal of Pak Air Force employee without service. Accepting any of the benefits involved in a criminal case, the employee (defendant), under constitutional jurisdiction, accepted his dismissal order before the High Court, whereby the administration was dismissed. Authorities (appellants) were instructed in their request. In the letter / circular taken by the authorities, its beneficial decisions were that the jurisdiction of the High Court was withheld under Article 199 (3) of the Constitution; therefore, the unwanted decision was without jurisdiction; If his case is contained in the subparagraph of paragraph 4 of the circular, the circular under discussion in this case did not remove the employee's option to remove the employee, and the competent authority is satisfied that the employee was involved. One of the morally backward offenses, therefore, was rightfully removed from the job The overreaching employee was removed from the job on the grounds that he was involved in a criminal case but acknowledged that the lawsuit At the hearing, the court acquitted him in the said case. It took advantage of the doubt that the employee's retention or termination of employment depended on paragraph 5 of the Inheritance Circular, which had to be read with paragraph 4 (ii) of the same circular authority which claimed that the employee was not entitled to pension benefits. Thayer wanted the length of service, but the order dismissing the employee's approval by the authority was not in accordance with the terms of the Circular Law. w
