Section 53 Benefit of Partial Performance The scope of the sale of the disputed property is restricted to the registration of the disputed property property because the contract is not executed and such contract is issued by the contract-based transfer agent and the attorney Failure to prove the possession of the attorney The effect of the performance of the portion over the disputed property is not available without proof The plaintiff (respondent) of the scope filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff (appellant) of the disputed property and Claimed on title of disputed property regarding disputed property That the plaintiff, who was the forerunner in the interest of the defendants, had entered into a contract to sell in favor of the defendant. That the defendant was in possession of the disputed property. After the sale agreement was executed, the registration of the property was banned, therefore, the executioner executed the Atal Power of Attorney and, while agreeing with the defendant, the plaintiff was sworn to admit the possession of the trial court. Sworn in The appeal against the trial court's order was dismissed by the High Court through a valid sale agreement stating that the defendant had confiscated the disputed property to the defendant, who claimed that the property was Due to the ban on registration, the defendant acted on an unrelated power, the attorney said, adding that the contents of the Power of Attorney indicate that at the time of his execution, the disputed property was in possession of the deceased (transfer). Defendant seized the disputed property under a seller's agreement. No authority for the deceased (transfer)
