Find a Lawyer

WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (WAPDA) THROUGH CHAIRMAN versus DR. ALTAF-UR-REHMAN

RR 2 and 6 (b) (i) Work Chartered Employees For regular time scale grants Workplace service counting Scopework charged employee, although employed by WAPDA, WAPDA (Water Wing) Scientific Officers Could not avail of the service. Rules, 1980 stated that the employee's qualifications mentioned in the rules were not excluded under R6 (b) (i) of the Rules regarding ten consecutive years of continuous service for any benefit under it, And it was not formally qualified for the word, which would include anyone in Wapda's water wing regardless of its nature of service.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2012

• BABAR HUSSAIN SHAH v. MUJEEB AHMED KHAN 2012 SCMR 1235
• SHAMS UL AKKBAR SADIQ v. PROJECT MANAGER SKD 2012 SCMR 1243
• NANJEGOWDA v. GANGAMMA 2012 SCMR 1246
• Syed SHARIF UL HASSAN v. Hafiz MUHAMMAD AMIN 2012 SCMR 1258
• SADRUDDIN 2012 SCMR 1267
• GHULAM RASOOL v. SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE 2012 PLC(CS) 1271
• IKRAM-UL-HAQ v. Raja NAVEED SABIR 2012 SCMR 1273
• SHAH MUHAMMAD v. State 2012 SCMR 1276

All Supreme Court judgments of 2012 →

immigration advocate from Gujrat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes