Section 302/114 Murder, Corruption When Criminal Procedure Reasoned, Reliance on the Evidence of Scope Accused and Co-Appellant (Appellant) for such witnesses alleged that the complainant's presence after launching the attack on the victim. I killed him. They were also accused, co-accused and complainant business partners with swords. The trial court sentenced the accused and co-accused under sections 302 and 114 of the Code of Conduct. The seriousness of the accused and the accused was that the complainant, the accused. And the accused was a business partner, and the complainant may have committed the act so that he could take advantage of the matter by financing one partner and punishing the other. The complainant was an interested witness and his evidence cannot be relied on without proof. After 13 days, the recovery of blood-stained clothes and swords from his car was absolutely impossible. That the witness statements contained material contradictions / embellishments / corrections that made the prosecutor's case impossible, and that it was not possible for the accused and the co-accused to cause at least 33 wounds for the defendant. The reasons for the eviction / contradiction by the locals indicated by the accused and the accomplices were trivial, which did not come out on the basis of the original motive, and the accused and co-accused say that the complainant did not trust the evidence. Can be done As its sole and interesting witness, it was unacceptable for the accused and the co-accused to admit that the casualties may have been caused by cows in the area of the victim, as he had no power, as the dispute was between the accused and the accomplices. In the presence of , Who details the event
