Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN versus GHULAM MUSTAFA


Increased Pensions in Arts 212 (3) and 25 Civil Service Two Pensioners entitled to Equal Relief for Citizens were Increased in their Modified Pension by the Federal Service Tribunal of the High Court and the Supreme Court in view of Article 25 of the Constitution In the present case, the pensioners received the same relief (respondents). In the present case, the legitimate pensioners, in the present case, had to deal equally with the pensioners, in whose favor the decision of the High Court and the Supreme Court. Was taken by the source. With regard to any reasonable classification, no exception to the Federal Service Tribunal's unwritten decision could be made, no question of public importance was conveyed in the meaning of Article 1212 (3) of the Constitution, requests for leave of appeal. The circumstances were excluded, and the leave was denied

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocate from Kot Mithan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.