Section 5, Schedule and Section 14 Defamation of Marriage Defendant's wife (married when she was a minor) filed a lawsuit to dissolve the marriage against the plaintiff (her husband) under puberty, oppression and alternatives. The Khulla Family Court granted a decree for dissolution of marriage on the basis of Khulla without any consideration, even if a wife fails to prove all her principles for dissolution of marriage. Based on the strange facts and circumstances of the record of this case, a decree can be granted on the basis that, in the present case, it was proved that the plaintiff could not prove the truth of the atrocity, but In this case, she was hated that she could not survive. The defendant had, at any cost, made some allegations against the role of the plaintiff, keeping the age difference between the spouses, the trial court correctly found. That the plaintiff had incurred a hatred against the defendant. And that it was impossible for them to live a happy life within the limits set by Allah, and the right to dissolve the marriage on the basis of khula was justified, when the marriage covenant on the ground of khulla was terminated, the wife should have The husband who paid the price, in whole or in part, received it from his husband at the time of the marriage contract, as has been decided in the present case by the plaintiff in the court that the marriage amount of Rs.182,781. Which was paid to her in the form of jewelry. However, he clashed, saying that the defendant had seized the money in his possession. The defendant denied the claim of the plaintiff and stated that Z.
Related judgments — Shariat Court Azad Kashmir, 2012
