Section 7307 / Azad 34 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Enforcement Islamic Sanctions Law Act (IX of 1974), Section 5/15 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 Qatal an Oman, Enforcement of Prisoners, Joint Intent and Unlicensed Weapons The testimony of the testimony was acknowledged by the time, date and place of the incident, the defendant's presence of the accused party and the eyewitnesses, but the incident took place in a different way as the prosecution revealed the prosecution's evidence. It was said that the incident had already recurred. The incident took place between the parties and the moment caused by intense and sudden provocation, it was neither a plan nor a pre-planned attack. Counsel for Defendants Defending Your Advocate: The defense, because the circumstances did not support such a plea in a prosecutor's case, had no substance. A detailed examination of the ocular version revealed that The late DE was charged with the shooting of the accused and his accomplices, who also sustained serious injuries to the complainant and the prosecutor's witnesses, although eye witnesses were closely related to the deceased, Could not prove that they are hostile to the accused or do not care about making any false accusation against them or Evidence of eyewitnesses cannot be set aside for inclusion in the commission of a crime such as murder. Eyewitnesses were not interested because the ocular version was not reliable because it did not rely on the extent of the statement of the co-accused. The prosecution's testimony can be relied on against some of the accused, while others
Related judgments — Shariat Court Azad Kashmir, 2012
