Section 15 (E) examining the insider trading and examining the trading data of the stock exchange's automated trading system, revealed that the funds traded heavily through their own funds under the management of the company, under different management of the company. Funds made total profit on the sale of shares The company submitted its response, in response to the notice, which claimed that the company had no insider information about the sale of the shares. The related contract was submitted by another company. And since it didn't have any information about the seller's identity, it seems like it has no rational basis, as it usually takes a considerable amount of time to set up such deals, trading from the trading in question. Does not meet the standard of practices that a large partner would have expected. In the market that created suspicions and as a result, the commission initiated operations that gave the insider the impression of dealing with such dubious trade patterns and trading time, The regulator may believe in interference. The fair and proper functioning of a market company was a well-known and well-known asset administration in the country. And high standards of conduct and compliance were expected that the company was censored for reprimand and conduct, which did not conform to the high expectations that the company had expected. He was directed to abstain from trade in a manner which raised doubts. And in accordance with the letter and spirit of the Company's internal dealing management doubts
Related judgments — Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan, 2012
