Section 6, 14, 18 and 19, in order to avoid litigation and avoid litigation, both the trial court and the Court of Appeal dismissed the plaintiff / pre-emptor for lack of acquittal and remission, But the High Court had earlier submitted the trial. Importer claimed that the shopkeeper had offered to buy the land for the plaintiff, but he refused to buy it. And that after denial he could not turn and there was no point in filing a pre-arrest case. There was no evidence as to the oral evidence that the vendor merely offered to the plaintiff that he wanted to sell the land and he refused, the waiver could not be established, the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Pre-Purchase Act, 1993 Under Section 18 of the notice was mandatory, when a person wants to sell immovable property of any agricultural land or village for which any person had a right to buy in advance, the notice of sale of such land was given by a competent jurisdiction. The notice to be given by the court of authority should be in accordance with the provisions of the OV, CPC, before contracting, the seller going against a fixed price Ydad sale was subject to a notice should issue the notice said, will include details of the proposed property. If the pre-emptor fails to respond after receiving that notice, he or she will be deemed to have waived the right to pre-emptor. The mere presence of the plaintiff / ex-emptor at the time of the sale of the case, when the bargaining took place, did not prove the sale ies would have failed to prove to the defendant the alleged waiver that he did not waive his right to a former lien. , case hearing
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2012
