NAEEM KHALID LODHI versus PRESIDENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH CABINET SECRETARY, ISLAMABAD
Sections 15 and 16 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition, Defense Division, Government of Pakistan, August 28, 2011 Two-year agreement on standard terms and conditions Appointment of applicant to such post and suspension of service till next orders On August 1, 2012, the applicant dismissed his dismissal orders for such mismanagement without issuing a charge sheet or showcase notice, and by national and international media while taking charge of such office. The terms of the contract were accepted, including the termination of their service for any reason whatsoever. The applicant did not refuse to receive a month's salary in lieu of notice period and refused to be hired by the government for a three-year term as the managing director of the company. , She was not entitled to reinstate her contract The appointment of Secretary against the post of applicant could not be granted constitutional jurisdiction. The High Court upheld such media reports by the Government to upset the terms and conditions of its contract employment. Refused to prove the right, therefore, the High Court could not determine such a factual dispute and civil The provisions of Sections 15 and 16 of the Servants Act 1973 shall not apply to the applicant; service for disciplinary proceedings was not terminated. The incomplete order agreement was in accordance with the standard terms and conditions of appointment. The High Court dismissed the constitutional petition in the circumstances. \ R \ n \ r \ n
