MUHAMMAD AZHAR versus FEDERATION OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN
R5 (2) Cooperative Society Act (VII of 1925), Section 71 Notification 1 (151) Law / 2006 2179 Dated 23 5 2011 Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petition Bar Notification to Candidates who are contesting for the third term. Unable to edit source. 1 (151) Law / 2006 2179 23 5 2011 was banned from contesting for the third term under Rule 5 (2) of the Cooperative Society Election Rules 2004, on the basis that it was done without legal authority. Applicants admitted that it was stated that the notification was not issued on the directive of the Federal Government or the President, but on the advice of the National Accountability Bureau (NAB), the amendment of Jawid Syed was brought in Rule 5 (2) of the Cooperative Society Election Rules 2004. had gone. The legislature's case was to amend any law and regulation made under the NAB's proposal and then on the recommendation of the Senate Standing Committee. This means taking precautionary measures and using caution so that proposed amendments do not guarantee constitutional rights. The whole method of amending the rules was above the law and without any jurisdiction and said that the ban on the third term was against democratic values, the principles of the constitution and any amendments to any law or rule made thereunder. Which contradicts the subject of the Constitution and in nature cannot be allowed to interpret, especially when it comes from the same executive who adopted the novel method under the amendments made by notification 1. 151) Law / 2006 2179 dated 23 5 2011 declared as unlawful and unconstitutional from Rule 5 (2) of the Cooperative Societies Election Rules 2004
