MUHAMMAD ISLAM KHAN versus ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LTD.
Article 25 (b), 25 (a) and 15 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application Civil Service Corruption / Corruption Practices \ Voluntary Withdrawal a and \ plea Deal \ Discrimination Sentence The offender was dismissed on this basis. Earlier, an inquiry was filed against him alleging corruption that ended after the applicant's request for voluntary return. ) The National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 clearly states that a person who has obtained the benefits of section 25 (b) of the ordinance will also be considered punishable, but said that such person shall be fined Was not provided to anyone who has benefited. Section 25 (a) (voluntary withdrawal) In case of voluntary withdrawal, the accused was required to come forward voluntarily to return the assets or acquisitions as a result of corrupt practices and if offered a voluntary return before the investigation was allowed. If so, the Chairman NAB had the authority to accept the accused's offer and after that the accused could be relieved of all responsibility, facilitating voluntary withdrawal by the accused before being allowed to investigate, Whereas in the case of bargaining, the offer was made after the accused had allowed the inquiry, in the matter of hearing the petition. In the judgment of the accused, the decision was proved to be a crime, but in the case of voluntary withdrawal, no punishment was recorded by any court, therefore, the results of section 15 of the ordinance do not attract the issue of voluntary return. The present case was voluntary withdrawal and there was no fresh allegation of corruption against the applicant. , And someone on it
