Article 19 (7) (b), Proviso Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXXI, R 90 Investigation of mortgage auction claims and objections in this case has been submitted by the financial institution for payment of fines. Was. A suitable scope suit for recovery was decided after which the request of a defendant / applicant was allowed under section 19 (7) of the financial institutions (security 19) and the plaintiff bank filed a written promise for compensation. Was ordered to do. When the objections were proved to be valid in the case of the aggrieved party and paying a fine of 20%, the plaintiff's bank said that the order was not lasting because the defendant was obliged to pay the defendant bank and section 19 (7) for his liability. Did not This ordinance applies to the present case, which provides for a justification for section 19 (7) of the ordinance. It was clearly pointed out that under-taxation was to be given in writing through finance as per the provisions of section 19 of the Ordinance as well as in accordance with Article 19 of the Ordinance. (7) In accordance with the terms of the provision, the invalid order was valid and could not be interfered with and in accordance with the law.
