Find a Lawyer

DR. ALTAF HUSSAIN versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Article 199 Constitution Petition Civil Service Appointment was appointed on deputation against specific post for promotion of respondent Appointment was relaxed Appointment was denied the right to promote applicants Some of the respondents appointment External affairs were not the result of merit, on the principles of transparency, senior executives with credible processes and required qualification establishment who had the qualifications and experience to develop as executive directors, not on any valid reason. , But also allowed the appointment of defendants on false grounds, speculations and remedies. The High Court declared the dismissal illegal and the department was directed to initiate the development process immediately after considering the qualification of the welfare and fitness constitutional application.

Related judgments — Islamabad, 2013

• Syed WAQAR HUSSAIN GILLANI v. CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2013 CLC 1095
• MUHAMMAD GHAFOOR v. MINISTRY OF RAILWAY through Secretary/Chairman 2013 PLC(CS) 1113
• Raja SHEHRYAR v. PAKISTAN COUNCIL OF SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH 2013 PLC(CS) 1125
• M. ASHRAF AZEEM v. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 2013 PLC(CS) 1147
• PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LIMITED (PTCL) v. Mst. NAIMA AYUB 2013 CLC 1191
• MUHAMMAD KHALID v. The STATE 2013 PCrLJ 1197
• UNIVERSITY STAFF WELFARE ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY, ISLAMABAD v. RECTOR, INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY, ISLAMABAD 2013 PLC(CS) 1254
• MUHAMMAD ZAHID KHAN v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1254

All Islamabad judgments of 2013 →

top civil advocates from Garh More lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes