MAKHDOOM M. NIAZ INQLABI versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN
The constitutional application of Arts 218, 213 and 1991 reflects on the appointment of the Chief Election Commissioner and the requirement of the members of the Election Commission of Pakistan. Also failed. That such appointments were not made in accordance with Article 213 and Article 218 of the Constitution and stated that in the near future elections should not be held in the declaration that the appointments were made without following the prescribed procedure and That the ideology requirement of the Supreme Court was buried in 2013, for this reason, the applicants falling under the same belt are arguing that they were recently made aware of the inappropriate appointments through electronic media, And with no power the High Court observed that the timely and sensitive point of the present constitutional petition Need zr. And in light of the fact that the National and Provincial Assemblies are expiring soon, therefore, even if the applicants' argument is accepted, at the present stage, the High Court will refrain from issuing it. The writ; that the Supreme Court has undoubtedly buried the doctrine requirement for the time to come, and that the High Courts have been more vigilant in appreciating the intention of a party to bring any matter before the Constitutional Petition, without merit. Of, was excluded, circumstances
