Find a Lawyer

WAJID HUSSAIN versus STATE

Section 497 (1), third proviso panel code (XLV of 1860), section 365B abduction, coercion to force a woman to abduction or marriage, etc. Absence results in delays in trial. The delay in the trial is due to the co-accused who had absent himself from appearing in the trial court, one of the co-accused was told the wife of the third provision of the accused in section 497 (1). , Could not be requested by the CRP. In such a situation of the accused was unable to claim that the trial was delayed entirely or partially because of the prosecution, the accused's request for bail was dismissed

Related judgments — Islamabad, 2013

• RIZWAN KHAN v. State 2013 PCrLJ 678
• Dr. ABDUL GHAFOOR KHAN v. Haji MUHAMMAD TAJ 2013 CLC 678
• MAKHMOOD HUSSAIN v. State 2013 YLR 679
• TAUSEEF AHMAD v. FAUZIA AKRAM 2013 MLD 679
• SAJID TRADERS, LAHORE v. M/O COMMERCE, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Finance 2013 PTD 698
• Makhdoom M. NIAZ INQLABI v. ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN 2013 CLC 714
• ABDUL RAZZAQ v. State 2013 PCrLJ 718
• ABID MAHMOOD MALIK v. S.H.O., POLICE STATION MARGALLA 2013 MLD 736

All Islamabad judgments of 2013 →

patent advocate from Khandabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes