Sections 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 395 and 412 of these testimonies (1984 of 10), Arts 38 and 39 Robbery, Receiving stolen property fraudulently in the commission of robbery bail, without evidence On the basis of disclosures by the co-accused, the co-accused in the crime has already been granted bail. The influence against the accused persons was that they snatched an oil tanker belonging to the complainant and were present there. Sold the oil, there were cases of the accused were involved in the crime based on the disclosure of the co-accused. That no evidence has been collected by the police to determine who sold the stolen oil, to whom it was sold and for how much deliberation the alleged accused 3 of, under robbery charges under PPC. There was no evidence to link the accused to the charge. 412, the PPC was also lacking in view of the record, and the court-recorded evidence was initially arrested on the disclosure of the co-accused, which was later dismissed by the police after a compromise with the complainant, Was admitted / disclosed by a co-accused, evidence is not admissible in view of Arts 38 and 39 of 1984, allegedly for sale of stolen oil allegedly obtained by the accused in the mystery. And can also be determined in the case in which the allegedly used car was commissioned. The accused persons not shown in the FIR were given bail only with the matching role of the accused, therefore, applying the principle of consistency, he said that the accused were released on bail.
