CHENAB BOARD, FAISALABAD versus C.I.R.(A), R.T.O., FAISALABAD
Sections 2 (37), 11 (2), 36 (1), 45 and 72A Section RO No. 555 (I) / 1996 Dated 1 7 1996 Section RO No. 594 (I) / 2012 Dated 1 6 2012 Tax Fraud The legal jurisdiction of the tax assessment is that the tax included was far greater than the financial threshold set by the Commissioner for adjudication of cases. 1 remained in the field until 2012 when the Federal Government, pursuant to Section RO 594 (I) / 2012, recovered it under 1 6 2012, the Federal Government specifically mentioned that Section RO was dismissed. , That means on June 2, 2012. Under this, the prior notification of the jurisdiction of the various officers was very high in this field until 1 6 2012, when the show cause notice and the super-structure were created by the original order and order of the original appellate authority, Without jurisdiction and the quorum inadmissible show cause notice and order passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Inland Revenue above the original jurisdiction as set forth in Section RO 555 (I) / 1996 dated 1 7 1996. And so it was an order quorum and the jurisdiction taken without commission and commission for theft without any legal authority, Was negligent and no action could be taken against the taxpayers, thereafter the appeal was accepted by the appellate tribunal order which was first approved by the appellate authority and the order was actually declared invalid and no There was no legal result.
