C.I.R., R.T.O., FAISALABAD versus PROGRESSIVE WEAVERS (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD
In order to rectify the Section 221 error, the department requested the removal of some paragraphs because the caretaker of the department representative and diagnostic officer was in danger as he was summoned by the Federal Tax Ombudsman in contempt of court. Eligibility If such paragraphs are excluded at the request of the Department and after the relief in the first two appeals, and subsequently the appellants were not suppressed by it, the Appellate Tribunal of Appeal dealt with the taxpayer's statement, By mistake, the second set of appeals were not pressured. The Income Tax Ordinance was amended under Section 221 of 2001, as the Department requested the removal of remarks in some paragraphs and did not challenge the recommendations of the Federal Tax Ombudsman to the President, from such a paragraph order. Were removed and replaced. Second set of appeals rejected by pressing paragraph learners d. Counsel for appellant taxpayers
