Sections 161 and 205 Income Tax Rules, 2002, R44 (4) Failure to pay tax, Deposit or deduction The taxpayer failed to deduct tax on payments made under various heads, and was filed by the Government Treasury Authorities. I was not together. In these payments, which were tax deductible, and notices of total payments were issued under Sections 161 and 205 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, which required the submission of documents / details for reconciliation with the taxpayers. , But all of this is useless, because the taxpayer is the recipient. The dates always applied for a postponement, which was rejected. On the filing of an appeal by the Commissioner of Taxation (Appeal), the matter was returned to the Deputy Commissioner, setting the order approved under Section 161/205 of the Income Tax Ordinance; Under the jurisdictional view, the order affected was vacated due to the difference between the original payments and those payments. Taxes were deducted, this case required reconciliation in the light of Income Tax Rules 2002, KR 44 (4), which required the taxpayer's appellate tribunal to remand the tax officer to re-issue the case. Was denied the right opportunity for By law, after giving taxpayers a fair chance
