Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN TELEVISION CORPORATION LIMITED, ISLAMABAD versus COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (APPEALS-II), ISLAMABAD

Section 11 and 23 Input tax credit is claimed by the registered person for the relevant period. Such input tax was not supplied by the supplier's sale. The registered person's pledge was that the sale by his supplier was For non-tax filing, recovery proceedings can be initiated against the registered person. The Associating Officer was legally obliged to determine the authenticity of the registered person, if he succeeds, in presenting credible proof of payment of his sales tax as claimed by his input tax. This claim can be allowed as well as a retrieval action can be initiated against the supplier. For their failure to submit a cell tax, \ r \ n

Related judgments — Inland, 2013

• HOTEL ONE (PVT.) LTD. v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (ZONE-I), ISLAMABAD 2013 PTD 1256
• Malik FURRUKH v. COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (LEGAL), RAWALPINDI 2013 PTD 1265
• MOTORCYCLE ZONE SHOP, SARGODHA v. COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (APPEALS), RTO, FAISALABAD 2013 PTD 1283
• 2013 PTD 1288 2013 PTD 1288
• 2013 PTD 1297 2013 PTD 1297
• UNIQUE ENTERPRISES, RAWALPINDI v. COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ISLAMABAD 2013 PTD 1300
• TOYOTA RAWAL MOTORS, RAWALPINDI v. C.I.R., L.T.U., ISLAMABAD 2013 PTD 1309
• 2013 PTD 1313 2013 PTD 1313

All Inland judgments of 2013 →

when you need a advocate from Muzaffargarh lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes