ABDULLAH HANJRAH versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY
Article 199 Constitution Petition Civil Service Appointment Petitioner / Candidate alleges that he was treated unfairly, which resulted in him failing to take the written exam for the recruitment of Civil Judges / Judicial Magistrates in which he participated. The candidate also sought a declaration that he was entitled to take. To the effect that he was entitled to appear and compete in the next written examination for recruitment, the relief sought by the applicant was based on the decision of the Division Bench of the High Court, dated PLD 2011 by 212. The decision was dismissed before the Supreme Court, where the leave appeal was approved and the decision process was suspended when a fresh ad for the undergoing positions was published, the candidate having already passed the upper age limit of 35 years. Had exceeded and his application for relaxation of upper age limit was rejected by the competent authority. The candidate did not file any complaint against this decision, nor was it accepted b efore the High Court when the first written examination was held, the applicant neither participated in such examination nor He approached the High Court seeking a declaration regarding his eligibility to take the written test, the only candidate who had already cleared the first written test. , And had obtained at least 50% marks. The applicant had neither participated in the first written test, nor had at least 50%. The number obtained, in the circumstances, was under the misconception that the applicant had not made any effort to obtain his credit. According to the law and
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
