Find a Lawyer

ARIF NAWAZ versus MST. RABIA

Article 10 (4) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application Failure to proceed to pre-trial proceedings, Scope Plaintiff / Spouse filed suit for dissolution of marriage (Khulla), without having to inspect family court witnesses And after that the trial was unsuccessful, the family court decided its case without having to examine any witnesses. The defendant / husband's convictions were that the Family Court did not consider his written statement and adjudicated the case of his client / wife without examining any witnesses, and that his articles were still plaintiff / The wife has the Family Court empowered to decide the matter after the failure of the trial proceedings without having to examine any witnesses before the competent husband can file a case for the recovery of his articles. That a competent court of law should dismiss the constitutional application.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• ABDULLAH HANJRAH v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary 2013 PLC(CS) 747
• Mst. SAHIB KHATOON v. S.H.O. POLICE STATION, GARHI KHAIRO 2013 PCrLJ 749
• NIAZ FARAZ v. State 2013 MLD 753
• MUHAMMAD IQBAL DASTI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Water and Power Development, Authority, Islamabad 2013 PLC(CS) 760
• WAQAS v. State 2013 PCrLJ 765
• SHAMSUDDIN v. JEEVAT RAM 2013 YLR 765
• MUHAMMAD GUL v. MEMBER JUDICIAL, CUSTOMS APPELLANT TRIBUNAL, KARACHI 2013 PTD 765
• BOC PAKISTAN LIMITED v. NATIONAL GASES (PVT.) LIMITED 2013 CLC 767

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

top advocates from Dunyapur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes