Section 4 51 bond bail bond, confiscation of the guaranteed amount and the personal acquisition of the whole bond without any proof of guarantee, or personal acquittal of the bail, should be considered by the court, while the confiscation of the bail bond, the scope accused Bail bail was granted through a hearing, while bail could be obtained on bail. Applicant was granted bail for 300,000 applicants, who after being a guarantor, fled on suspicion of murder by the complaining party. The trial court seized the whole bail of bail and fined Rs 300,000. The entire amount was charged, which was directed to submit the same guarantee within one month. That he is a guarantor for humanitarian accused. That he made every effort to present the accused. That he was a poor man who has a big family and does not have the resources to earn the entire fine on the guarantee of a person without proof of any personal proof or personal benefit. In the present case, the court should have the authority. While imposing a bail on a dynamic and progressive approach, the nature of the crime, the defendant's attempt to present the accused and the financial status of the bailout, can also be taken into account, although this is not apparent when the order is approved. Whether an inquiry was made to evaluate the guarantee. la la softening / negligence or otherwise his efforts to pay a fine of Rs 300,000 imposed by the trial court amounted to 200,000 rupees, within one month amending the trial case. The request for was dealt with. \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
