Section 9 (c) Drug Control (Government Analyst) Rules, 2001, R4 (2) Suspects suspected of delaying sending a sample of suspicion in drug possession to the accused upon receipt of a spy report to the police. Arrested. He allegedly received 1,200 grams of hashish in his possession. The trial court sentenced and sentenced the defendant to six (6) days for sending a sample to a chemical analyst under Section 9 (c) of the Drug Abuse Act of 1997. Regarding sending the sample for analysis for more than 72 hours after the seizure of drug substance control (Government Analysts) Rules, 2001, was not mandatory but until the sample should be dispatched as soon as possible. That the reasons should not be recorded. (Police Officer) who had the sample for six () days should record through the prosecution whether the samples were in safe custody or the sealed parcel containing the sample seal before any prosecutor's witness (police officers). Was not closed and, regardless of the actual condition of the samples in the parcel, all the prosecution witnesses recognized the marijuana recovered from the possession of the accused property (narcotic) as presented in court. After a chemical examination and speculation by a chemical analyst, it can be found that the seals belong to the Chemical Examiner's office, but prosecutors' witnesses (police officers) have removed them. And the signatures were investigated dishonestly, making the whole prosecutor's case a suspect. Doubts were taken advantage of and they were acquitted accordingly
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
