Sections 6, 7 and 23 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324 / 353/148/149 of the Anti-Terrorism Court, in the scope of scope attack on a police post in a remote area, whether a terrorist The incident was allegedly by the accused. The police packet was attacked, resulting in the death of a police officer who had no public in the vicinity. The Anti-Terrorism Court allowed the plea of the accused under Section 23 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997. And moved the case. The court session was held on the basis that the complainant and eyewitnesses did not mention that the firing of the accused persons, in the judgment of sections 6 and 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, was harassed, frightened in public law. , Terror and insecurity were created. In 1997, the phrase action carried more weight than the phrase intended for the incident site, in the present case, a police rally that was usually set up in an area to ensure its safety and security. can go. In the present case, as a crime in the jurisdiction, which was the attack on the police post, such action creates a disturbing situation and the impression on the people that, if the police and police posts were not safe, what would be the effect? Such measures show that there is lawlessness and that the public has felt the grave effects of insecurity, lawlessness and uncertainty on a large scale, resulting in the issue not being private and the accused deliberately deliberate. Police were attacking with deadly weapons. In the present case, it was taken by the accused persons
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
