Section 417 (2A) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 193, 196, 463 and 471, using false evidence as a forged document as a forged document, to maintain a criminal conviction. Appeal Scope accused against the person concerned filed a civil case against the appellant on the basis of a fake sale agreement. The High Court filed a case against the accused under Sections 193, 196, 436 and 471, PPC. After the record was produced in the trial court. The accused persons were acquitted of evidence. Appellant's assertion was that the defendants, in their statements under Section 342, CRPC, stated that they had been falsely implicated by the appellant who himself was involved in the correction / tampering with the disputed documents. ? The judgment did not consider the respondents' response nor was it the basis for acquittal of the respondents o f the defendants were that the appellant was neither complainant nor inconvenienced by the trial court's findings. I was the victim and in the passage of the verdict, no observation was made against the appellant under which he was deprived of his legal rights protected under the Constitution and did not result. Under Section 342, CRPC, the statement of loss of personal benefit / benefits of the accused did not fall within the purview of any affected person so he was not entitled to appeal against the offenders. The evil was excluded accordingly
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
