Find a Lawyer

IMDAD HUSSAIN TUNIO versus STATE

Arts 203DD and 203G Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Articles 435 and 439 Amendments filed before the High Court against the Federal Shariat Court Scope Revision application against an order passed under the law relating to the enforcement of hooded maintenance. went. Under any law governing the implementation of HUDO in relation to disputes affecting the rights of the parties, the criminal court was revised by the Federal Shariah Court under Article 203 DD of the Constitution, not the High Court. And under 439, P.C.P.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• ALLAH BACHAYAO alias RIAZ v. State 2013 YLR 866
• SIKANDER ALI v. State 2013 MLD 872
• ASHIQ ALI v. State 2013 YLR 878
• SHABIR TILES AND CERAMICS LIMITED v. CACHE SYSTEMS PAKISTAN 2013 CLD 880
• ALLAH BAKHSH v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER 2013 MLD 885
• GHULAM SARWAR v. State 2013 YLR 885
• AMIN BAZ v. State 2013 YLR 891
• BOC PAKISTAN LIMITED v. NATIONAL GASES (PVT.) LIMITED 2013 CLD 898

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

best advocate from Bhakkar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes