Section 9 (c) sentenced to praise for evidence of intoxication, reduction in excise authorities arrested the accused from a vehicle on the basis of the detective's report and three kilograms of hashish was recovered in his possession, the trial court The accused was convicted under section 9 (c). He was sentenced to ten years in prison, with the Drug Use Act 1997, and a fine of Rs 50,000. The prosecution witnesses gave the same version during their investigation, while defense counsel could not find any fault in Chars' recovery during the investigation. Separation of samples for chemical inspection, and any change in the weight of the samples sent to the chemical inspector were sent on time to check and the report received in this regard was not positive, with the accused police officials. Prosecution witnesses did not suggest hostility. Arrest and recovery proceedings, like any other independent witness, were competent witnesses and their testimony could not be excluded merely on the basis that they were police officers. The prosecution had proved the matter beyond reasonable doubt, but the accused was convicted. Was given With the benefits of Section 382B, the severe punishment of the accused was reduced from ten years to five years imprisonment and the fine was reduced from Rs 50,000 to Rs 25,000. The appeal of the PC was dropped along with the said amendment documents.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
